Linnaean nomenclature in the 21st Century: a report from a workshop on integrating traditional nomenclature and phylogenetic classification
نویسندگان
چکیده
The participants in the Workshop were brought together to consider how best to integrate the needs of phylogenetic classification given our current system of naming the world’s biota. The Workshop was developed as a follow-up to the 2001 Smithsonian Botanical Symposium held in Washington, D.C., the results of which were published in Taxon [volume 51(1), 2002]. The Smithsonian symposium was attended by 190 scientists from numerous countries. At that meeting issues concerning the Linnaean naming system and the needs of an emerging phylogeny-based classification were discussed. Participants in this follow-up Workshop at the Hunt Institute in Pittsburgh were selected on the basis of their response to a widely distributed announcement about the planned workshop. In addition, several individuals were specifically invited because of the particular perspective they would bring to the discussion. It is recognized that the results of the workshop have predominantly American and botanical perspectives. Although the discussion centred on the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN) (Greuter & al., 2000), many of the comments are also applicable to the Zoological and Bacteriological Codes as well. This report is offered for discussion and critique with the hope that it will be useful to the community of taxonomists and biologists at large in understanding and formulating a workable system of nomenclature and classification. Attendees at the workshop included co-moderators Robert W. Kiger (Hunt Institute) and W. John Kress (U.S. National Herbarium), and participants Theodore M. Barkley (Botanical Research Institute of Texas), Richard K. Brummitt (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew),
منابع مشابه
Linnaeaii, rank-based, and phylogenetic nomenclature: Restoring primacy to the link between names and taxa
de QueiroK, K. 2005. Linnaean, rank-based, and phylogenetic nomenclature: Restoring primacy to the link between names and taxa. Acta Univ. Lips. Symb. Bor. Upa. 33:3, 127-140. Uppsala, ISBN 91-554-6192-1. Linnaeus and other 18"" Century naturaii.sts practiced nomenclature in a way that associated laxon names more strongly with taxa (group.s) than with the categorical ranks of the taxonomic ("Li...
متن کاملThe Role of Iranian Culture and Brocade (Zarbaft) in Nomenclature of the Silk Road
The term "Silk Road" was first used in 1876 AD (1292 AH. / 1254 ASH.) by a German geographer and tourist during his travel to China. Richthofen chose this name for the vast network of roads connecting Asia and Europe, from the China Sea to Central and Western Asia, especially the Iranian plateau, and Anatolia to the Mediterranean coast. This nomenclature was influenced by several circumstances ...
متن کاملA new nomenclature for fungi
Important changes brought about by the Melbourne International Code of Nomenclature for Algae,FungiandPlantsare briefly reviewed concerning a clarification of the spelling and typification of sanctioned fungal names, the recognition of electronic publication for the validity of nomenclatural novelties, permission to use English diagnoses or descriptions for their valid publication, and the requ...
متن کاملStems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead?
Recent radical proposals to overhaul the methods of biological classification are reviewed. The proposals of phylogenetic nomenclature are to translate cladistic phylogenies directly into classifications, and to define taxon names in terms of clades. The method has a number of radical consequences for biologists: taxon names must depend rigidly on the particular cladogram favoured at the moment...
متن کاملREPRINT Biological Nomenclature from Linnaeus to the PhyloCode
Linnaeus and other 18th Century naturalists practiced nomenclature in a way that associated taxon names more strongly with taxa (groups) than with the categorical ranks of the taxonomic (“Linnaean”) hierarchy. For those early naturalists, ranks functioned merely as devices for indicating hierarchical position that did not affect the application or spelling of taxon names. Consequently, taxa did...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004